Federal
Fines and Sanctions
California
Fines and
Santions(59) $7,805,000.00
City of Los
Angeles Fines $555,000.00
Colorado
State Sanctions and Fines
Maryland
Sanctions and fines $100,000.00 +
Missouri
Fines and Sanctions $550
Ohio
Sanctions and Fines $49,963.00
Oregon
Sanctions and Fines $105,624
Texas
Sanctions and Fines $1,000,000.00 Official Order of the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Texas
Washington
State Sanctions and Fines $65,000
MAMMOGRAM
STAFF AND EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS
For the average citizen to
better understand why small fines are given
to Kaiser - further insulting the people that have been
victimized by Kaiser proven criminal actions |
Federal
Fines and Sanctions
June
4, 2007 "Review
of Vendor Rebates Paid to Hospitals-Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and
Health Plans, Inc., Oakland, California (A-05-07-00051) The objective of the review was
to determine whether Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Health Plans, Inc.
(the provider) reduced costs reported on its fiscal year 2003 Medicare
cost report by the $35,438 vendor rebate it received. The
provider did not reduce costs reported on its fiscal year 2003 Medicare
cost report by the $35,438 rebate, contrary to Federal regulations and
CMS guidance.
...recommended
that the provider (1) revise and resubmit its 2003 Medicare cost
report, if not already settled, to properly reflect the $35,438 rebate
as a credit reducing its health care costs
and (2) consider performing a self-assessment of its internal controls
to ensure that future vendor rebates are properly credited on its
Medicare cost reports. The provider agreed
http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region5/50700051.htm
April
15, 2003 Kaiser Foundation Hospital –Sunset, Los
Angeles, California,
agreed to pay $20,000 to resolve its liability for CMPs under the
patient
dumping statute. The OIG alleged that Kaiser was a hospital that had
specialized
capabilities or facilities that refused to accept the transfer from
another
hospital of an 83-year-old patient needing Kaiser’s
capabilities for coronary
bypass surgery. The OIG alleged that Kaiser’s cardiac surgeon
refused to
accept the transfer saying that the patient was too unstable to
transfer
and that he was going to die anyway. The patient was transferred to
another
hospital where he underwent successful surgery and was discharged. December 05, 2005 Kaiser Foundation
Hospital, California, agreed to pay $20,000 to resolve its liability
for CMPs under the patient dumping statute.
OIA Kaiser Hawaii Agreement
Kaiser needed corrective actions requested
by HHS for human research Oct, 23, 2000 Kaiser
caught overbilling Medicare. Fall 2002 HHS It is the decision of the Medicare
Appeals Council that Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. is financially
responsible for the ambulance services obtained on February 27, 2002.
National
Summit
on Medical Errors UNITED
STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD The
Board held
that the administrative law judge's dismissal of a claim by Permanente
Medical Group/Kaiser Foundation Hospital an intervenor-petitioner,
constituted
an abuse of discretion. SUBCOMMITTEE
ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS- 103rd Congress FOIA
WARNING LETTERS USA B4 FEDERAL
TRADE
COMMISSION MESA COUNTY PHYSICIANS INDEPENDENT PRACTICE ASSOCIATION
Kaiser
Foundation Research problems with procedures for human protection July
22, 1998 http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/t1936m.pdf
Kaiser Colorado Guaifenesin extended relief
Tablet non FDA approval notice
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/g3575d.pdf
April 8, 2003 In April 2001,
Coventry took over the Medicare contract for Kaiser
Permanente and
received payments under contract number H1751 through December 31, 2000
http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region7/70200148.pdf
Kaiser
Sanction
of April 25, 2001 L A, Ca This is the Sanction regarding the lack of care that Vickie Travis' father,
Adam
Wesley Arnold received which led to his death.
Medicare
Overpayment Kaiser Santa Clara of - $179,018.00 - Audit completed 2002 http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region7/70102630.pdf
Kaiser
Sanction by The Department of Health and Human
Services - April 25, 2001 http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/sanction.html
April 27,
1998 Review of Medicare Payments for Beneficiaries with Institutional
Status, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Portland, Oregon(A-05-97-00023 )
Sanction levied against Kaiser
Permanente Sunset Facility by the County of Los Angeles,
Department
of Health Services on behalf of the Federal Government http://horror.kaiserpapers.info/heart/512.html
Department
of Health and Human Services - October 25, 2007 Survey report on Kaiser
Foundation Hospital Fresno. The Kaiser plan of correction was
denied by CMS as of February 1, 2008. A new Plan of Correction by
Kaiser is due to CMS by February 8, 2008.
It
clearly states that
once again, that an investigation was initiated by the reporting of The
Los Angeles Times. The report states that when articles, such as
this appear, it is necessary a regulatory investigation of the event
mentioned in the article occurs. - This means that if the
only reason the government investigated this facility was because of
The Los Angeles Times, how many dozens of other hospitals or medical
facilities are the same or worse but are not investigated because there
is no large scale publicity? NOTE: This is a large
document. If it does not readily open online for you I suggest
that you right click with your mouse and "save link as" to download it
to your computer. http://kaiserpapers.info/pdfs/cmsfresnrecdfeb2008.pdf
FDA Warning Letters
Warning
letter of February 26, 2007 to George Halvorson regarding the marketing
by Kaiser of Belladonna Alka/Ergotamine and PB (Bellamine S) tablets, a
drug
product containing ergotamine tartrate. FDA
Warning Letters to Kaiser Permanente - Kaiser Vallejo On July 1, 2004, a representative of the State of
California, acting in behalf of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
inspected your facility. This inspection revealed a serious problem
involving the conduct of mammography at your facility. http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/fda.html
Recalled Plasma - Kaiser
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ENFORCE/ENF00257.html
_____________ PRODUCT Recovered Plasma, Recall
#B-359-3 CODE Units numbers: A21838,
A22033, A22066, A22135, A22137, A22155, A22184, A22207, A22234,
A22245, A22309, A22346, A22371, A30030, A30059,
A300068, A30087, A30101, A30111, A30114, A30159, A30183, A30184,
A30195. MANUFACTURER Southern California
Permanente Medical Group/dba Kaiser Foundation Blood Donor Center,
San Diego, California. RECALLED BY Manufacturer by
telephone March 11, 1993 and by letter March 17, 1993. Firm-initiated recall
ongoing. DISTRIBUTION Florida, California. QUANTITY 24 units were
distributed. REASON Recovered Plasma,
collected from autologous donors who did not meet the following
suitability requirements for allogeneic use was distributed
or: 1) reported histories of hepatitis or jaundice; 2)
exhibited signs or symptoms of AIDS; 3) reported recent
tattoos, ear piercing or acupuncture treatment; 4)
reported receiving an allogeneic transfusion within the twelve
months prior to donating; 5) reported a history of cancer;
6) reported current use of medications.
RECALLS AND FIELD CORRECTIONS:
BIOLOGICS -- CLASS III ==================
_______________ PRODUCT Recovered Plasma. Recall
#B-360-3 CODE Unit numbers: A21987,
A22019, A22187, A22224, A22269, A22272, A22277, A22340. MANUFACTURER Southern California
Permanente Medical Group/dba Kaiser Foundation Blood Donor Center,
San Diego, California. RECALLED BY Manufacturer by
telephone March 11, 1993, and letter March 17, 1993. Firm-initiated recall
ongoing. DISTRIBUTION Florida, California. QUANTITY 8 units were
distributed. REASON Recovered Plasma,
collected from autologous donors who did not meet the following
suitability requirements for allogeneic use were
distributed: 1) reported histories of hepatitis or jaundice; 2)
exhibited signs or symptoms of AIDS; 3) reported recent
tattoos, ear piercing or acupuncture treatment; 4)
reported receiving an allogeneic transfusion within the twelve
months prior to donating; 5) reported a history of cancer;
or 6) reported current use of medications.
MAMMOGRAM
STAFF AND EQUIPMENT
PROBLEMS Kaiser
Vallejo WARNING LETTER November 4, 2004 and also in pdf form at:
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/g5069d.pdf
Oct. 15, 2003 Kaiser Parma, Ohio
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/g4343d.pdf
and
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/g4343d.htm
Kaiser Vallejo Dec. 10, 2001
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/g2051d.pdf
Kaiser Hayward WARNING LETTER November 6,
2002 and in pdf form at:
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/g3672d.pdf
Kaiser Baldwin Park June 8, 2001
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/g1375d.pdf
Kaiser Panorama City June 8, 2001
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/g3257d.pdf
Sept. 14, 2000 Pleasant Hill, California
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/m4200n.pdf
Sept. 14, 2000 Antioch, California
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/m4199n.pdf
September 29, 2000 Kaiser Mountain View,
California http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/m4246n.pdf
Oct. 19, 1998 Charlotte, NC
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/m2130n.pdf
Oct, 22, 1999 Charlotte, NC
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/m3096n.pdf
Sept. 2, 1999 - Chapel Hill, NC
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/m2981n.pdf
Kaiser San Francisco May 7, 1998 -
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/d1771b.pdf
Kaiser San Francisco - May 14, 1998
http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/d1781b.pdf
Kaiser on average pays the State
of California Department of Managed Health Care a little over
$1,000,000.00 per year in fines.
In
comparison for the 7 years that DMHC has been in existence - :
Aetna was ordered to pay - $ 385,375.00; Healthnet - $
972,500.00; Blue Cross - [taking into consideration that 3 documents
are missing and one was found misfiled in the Health Net section, so
some data is missing] - $1,309,000.00; Blue Shield - [again some
documents could not be located as indexed on the DMHC web site] -
$487,500.00.
California
Fines and Santions
1-/26/07 - Department of Public Health on Kaiser Permanente regarding the Santa Clara Hospital fine of $25,000 at: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/facilities/Documents/2567KaiserFoundation.pdf and http://californianews.kaiserpapers.info/pdfs/2567KaiserFoundation.pdf text version of the above pdf file is at: http://californianews.kaiserpapers.info/kaiserpermanentesantaclaratextfine.html
For a complete list of
DMHC
enforcement actions
against Kaiser please
see this very lengthy list at: http://www.dmhc.ca.gov
$2,500.00 July 30, 2007 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/23251.pdf
$5,000.00 July 30, 2007 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/24017.pdf
$3,000,000.00 July 30,
2007 Consent
Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/24139.pdf
July 30, 2007 Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan, Inc: Consent Agreement Re: Oversight of Quality
Assurance Programs, July 30, 2007 http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/noteworthy/enf_notew.asp
$250,000.00 May 3, 2007 Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan, Inc: Letter of Agreement Re:Reasonable Person
Standard for ER Claims, May 3, 2007 http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/22560.pdf
$7,500.00 April 18, 2007 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/23092.pdf
$225,000.00 March 1,
2007 Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan, Inc.: Letter of Agreement
Re: Post Claims Underwriting, March 1,
2007 http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/22337.pdf
$2,500.00 February 21,
2007 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/22113.pdf
$100,000.00 December
13, 2006 Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan, Inc.: Letter of Agreement
Re: Post Claims Underwriting, December
13, 2006 http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/21519.pdf
October 6, 2006 Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan, Inc.: Order To Reinstate
Enrollee's Health Care Coverage - October 6, 2006 http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/doc000.pdf
$2,500.00 September 12,
2006 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/20819.pdf
$5,000.00 September 8,
2005 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/19496.pdf
$5,000.00 August 21,
2006 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/20480.pdf
$7,500.00 August 18, 2006 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/20271.pdf
$2,000,000.00 (Kidney Transplant Services 06-162) August 9, 2006 Consent
Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/20533_2.pdf
$5,000.00 March 7, 2006 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/18550.pdf
(Kidney Transplant Services 06-162) May 12, 2006 Order
re: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals' San Francisco Kidney Transplant
Medical Center http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/19793.pdf
(Kidney Transplant Services 06-162) May 10, 2006 Stipulated
Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/19729.pdf
$2,500.00 April 24, 2006 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/19390.pdf
April 4, 2006 ORDER
RE: COMPLIANCE WITH California Code of Regulations, title 28, section
1300.65(c)(4) http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/19412.pdf
$2,500.00 December 6,
2005 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/17902.pdf
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
carry over from violation levied in 2001 and no longer reflected on the
DMHC website but is referenced in this document. July 18, 2005 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/16686.pdf
$2,500.00 Handling
of Grievance 05-189)
July 14, 2005 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/16273.pdf
$5,000.00 (Handling of Grievance 05-188) July 14, 2005 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/16233.pdf
$10,000.00 April 28,2005 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/15583.pdf
$2,500.00 April 11, 2005 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/15439.pdf
(Order against former Kaiser
employee 05-081)
April, 15, 2005 Amended
Order for Discontinuance of Injurious Practices http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/16009.pdf
March 17, 2005 Order
for Discontinuance of Injurious Practices http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/14886.pdf
$5,000.00 February 25,
2005 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/14514.pdf
$2,500.00 January 7,
2005 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/13661.pdf
$5,000.00 December 7,
2004 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/13663.pdf
$5,000.00 (Handling of Grievance 04-162) October 8, 2004 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/11634a.pdf
$5,000.00 October 8, 2004 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/11634a.pdf
$2,500.00 (Handling of Grievance 04-119) August 4, 2004 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/12069.pdf
$2,500.00 (Handling of Grievance 04-039) April 14, 2004 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/10842.pdf
$2,500.00 (Handling of Grievance 04-037) April 14, 2004 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/10844.pdf
$2,500.00 (Handling of Grievance 03-423) March 17, 2004 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/10670.pdf
$2,500.00 (Handling of Grievance 03-422) March 17, 2004 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/10732.pdf
$2,500.00 (Handling of Grievance 03-421) March 17, 2004 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/10737.pdf
$2,500.00 (Handling of Grievance 03-230) December 16, 2003 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/10108.pdf
$10,000.00 (Handling of Grievance 03-185) December 15, 2003 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/10095.pdf
$7,500.00 (Handling of Grievance 03-186,
03-187, and 03-188)
December 15, 2003 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/10096.pdf
$2,500.00 (Handling of Grievance 03-350) December 15, 2003 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/10097.pdf
$2,500.00 (Handling of Grievance 03-352) December 15, 2003 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/97142.pdf
$10,000.00 (Handling of Grievance 03-119) October 9, 2003 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/9045.pdf
$40,000.00 (Handling of Grievance 03-085) August 28, 2003 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/8986.pdf
$50,000.00 (Handling of Grievance 02-084) June 13, 2003 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/8126.pdf
$1,000,000.00 Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan (Margaret Utterback) December 3, 2002 Dismissal
of Amended Accusation http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/6192.pdf
$1,100,000.00 - $100,000.00
later removed and above referrenced item - payment made. November 15, 2002 Stipulation,
Decision, and Order http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/6053.pdf
$5,000.00 November 15,
2002 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/5636.pdf
$100,000.00 (Adopting IMR Decision 01-047,
02-033) August 26, 2002 Letter
of Agreement: Home Health Care http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/5086.pdf
(Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,
Inc. v. Daniel Zingale) June 27, 2002 Court
of Appeal Opinion http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/viagra020727.pdf
$110,000.00 Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan (Timothy Waters) May 24, 2002 Stipulated
Settlement Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/4192.pdf
March 19, 2002 Cease
and Desist Orderhttp://kaiserpapers.info/images http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/3695.pdf
$5,000.00 (Handling of Grievance 01-156) November 16, 2001 Letter
of Agreement http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/2459.pdf
$5,000.00 (Handling of Grievance 01-143) November 16, 2001 Letter
of Agreement (Handling of Grievance 04-162) http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/2420.pdf
$500,000.00 November
15, 2001 Accusation
and Assessment of Administrative Penalty http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/2331.pdf
(Prescription Drug Benefits 00-245) July 6, 2001 Ruling
on Submitted Matter http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/viagra_ruling.pdf
$25,000.00 Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan (KP On-line) December 27, 2000 Assessment
of Administrative Penalty http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/001227.pdf
Kaiser
Permanente faces record fine By
Tracy Weber and Charles Ornstein,
Times Staff Writer 9:09 PM PDT, July 25, 2007 LOS
ANGELES -- Kaiser Permanente will be assessed a record fine Thursday
for its haphazard investigations of questionable care, physician
performance and patient complaints at its California hospitals, state
HMO regulators said Wednesday.
The California Department of Managed Health Care said it will
levy a $3 million fine against Kaiser, the largest health maintenance
organization in the state, with 29 medical centers and more than 6
million members. If Kaiser makes necessary improvements, agency
director Cindy Ehnes said, she will forgive $1 million of that. http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-kaiser26jul26,0,351981,full.story?coll=la-home-center
From
DMHC http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/aboutTheDMHC/gen/ann/ann_prkaiserqap.asp FINAL
REPORT http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/reports/med_survey/surveys/055full072607.pdf in
html/text form at: http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/dmhc72007
Kaiser
Told to Reinstate Coverage Regulators'
action
in a kidney patient's case comes as scrutiny over cancellations grows.
By
Lisa Girion, Times
Staff Writer
October 19, 2006 State regulators for the first time have ordered a health plan to
reinstate the insurance coverage of a patient whose policy was ruled to
have been illegally canceled. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-kaiser19oct19,1,3274480.story?coll=la-headlines-business&track=crosspromo
mirrored at: http://californianews.kaiserpapers.info/oct192006.html
Kaiser
says it
will finally pay fine of $1,000,000.00 levied by Department of Managed
Health Care in 2000./Nov. 2002 http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/kaiser1milliondollarfine.html
Kaiser
fined1/2
Million Dollars by DMHC in California for death of 19 year old for
denial
of medical treatment http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/november15.html
1999 - Karl
Jacobs and
Tami Michelle Cope appeared before the Southern Compliance Committee
as
the result
of an investigation that revealed that Kaiser Hospital Pharmacy
incorrectly
filled narcotic
requisitions,
and pharmacy staff did not follow the pharmacy’s policy and
procedures. http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/karltami.html
1998 Kaiser
Cited Again
For ImproperUse Of Unlicensed Surgical Technicians!!! CNA received written notice from the DHS that they
had issued another Statement of Deficiencies (SOD) against Kaiser-Sacramento
(Morse Ave.) facility for their improper use of unlicensed surgical technicians.
Kaiser was using the unlicensed technicians as first assistants during
orthopedic procedures. Nurses reported numerous eye-witness accounts of
unlicensed technicians suturing, cutting tissue, using a bovie on vessels,
and drilling pins and screws. The hospital was cited in 1996 for allowing
the unlicensed technician to administer marcaine into the joints of patients
in the OR. http://horror.kaiserpapers.info/cnatechno.html
1998 Kaiser Permanente Hospital in Santa Rosa has been cited by the state
Department of Health Services for allowing a technician to perform medical
procedures during orthopedic operations.
The Santa Rosa hospital is the third Kaiser facility to be cited by
the state for using an unlicensed assistant during operations. Kaiser hospitals
in Sacramento and in San Jose were also cited by the agency, which licenses
and regulates the state's hospitals.
The investigation of Kaiser in Santa Rosa, conducted in June and completed
Aug. 7, revealed that the hospital's four orthopedic surgeons were using
an orthopedic assistant, who is a technician, to perform such procedures
as suturing deep tissue wounds, placing pins in bones and cauterizing veins. http://horror.kaiserpapers.info/cnamoreunlicen.html
1998 The death
investigation of 7 - year - old Gregory McCan was the latest in a string
of state queries into
patient deaths, emergency room delays and other problems at Kaiser
facilities
in the East Bay. http://californianews.kaiserpapers.info/gregorymccan.html
Kaiser
Radiation Event 1999 Los Angeles May 24, 1999
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center L.A. COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES |NOTIFICATION DATE: 05/21/1999 LICENSEE: KAISER PERMANENTE MED CARE PROGRAM
THERAPEUTIC MEDICAL MISADMINISTRATION AT KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CARE | | PROGRAM OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. | | | | A PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR THREE THERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS FOR CANCER OF THE | | CERVIX USING THE HIGH DOSE RATE AFTERLOADER. PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF THE | | FIRST TREATMENT ON 04/23/99, THE AUTHORIZED USER MADE A "LAST MINUTE" CHANGE | | IN THE TREATMENT PLAN WITH RESPECT TO THE SOURCE TRAVEL DISTANCE. AFTER THE | | CHANGE WAS MADE, THE SETUP CALLED FOR THE SOURCE TO BEGIN AT 989 | | MILLIMETERS. THE PHYSICIST, HOWEVER, SET UP THE UNIT SO THAT THE SOURCE | | BEGAN ITS TRAVEL AT 889 MILLIMETERS. PRIOR TO INITIATION OF THE TREATMENT, | | THE AUTHORIZED USER, PHYSICIST, AND TECHNOLOGIST SIGNED OFF ON THIS | | TREATMENT PLAN. THE PATIENT WAS THEN TREATED. THE SOURCE TRAVEL DISTANCE | | WAS 100 MILLIMETERS SHORTER THAN THE TREATMENT PLAN REQUIRED, AND DIFFERENT | | FROM THAT INTENDED. IT WAS NOT NOTED DURING OR AFTER COMPLETION OF THIS | | TREATMENT. | | | | THE SECOND TREATMENT OCCURRED ON 04/30/99. A SECOND PHYSICIST, WITHOUT | | VERIFYING THE ACCURACY OF THE FIRST TREATMENT, SET UP THE SECOND TREATMENT | | USING THE SAME PARAMETERS, A TRAVEL DISTANCE OF 894 MILLIMETERS. THE | | AUTHORIZED USER, PHYSICIST, AND TECHNOLOGIST SIGNED OFF ON THE SECOND | | TREATMENT PLAN. THE TREATMENT WAS ADMINISTERED TO A DIFFERENT LOCATION THAN | | INTENDED. THE ERROR WAS NOT NOTED PRIOR TO, DURING, OR AFTER THIS | | TREATMENT. | | | | THE THIRD TREATMENT PERFORMED ON 05/07/99 BY A THIRD PHYSICIST WHO SET UP | | THE PARAMETERS CORRECTLY, AS PLANNED (TRAVEL DISTANCE OF 994 MILLIMETERS) | | WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT INCIDENT. | | | | THE THIRD PHYSICIST PERFORMED A CHART REVIEW ON 05/11/99 AND FOUND THE ERROR | | IN THE 04/23/99 AND 04/30/99 TREATMENTS AND NOTIFIED THE RADIATION THERAPY | | ADMINISTRATOR AND CHIEF OF SERVICE. | | | | THE REGIONAL RADIATION SAFETY OFFICER (RSO) WAS NOTIFIED ON 05/17/99 BY THE | | SITE RSO IN VIOLATION OF THE REQUIRED 4 HOUR NOTIFICATION TIME. | | | | THE PATIENT AND HIS REFERRING PHYSICIAN WERE NOTIFIED OF THIS INCIDENT ON | | 05/18/99. | | | | A COMPLETE INVESTIGATION OF THESE INCIDENTS, INCLUDING A DOSE ASSESSMENT, | | AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACTION PLAN TO PREVENT FURTHER OCCURRENCES WILL BE | | MADE. http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/1999/19990524en.html
DMHC
for the
State of California Enforcement Actions Against Kaiser Permanete
This case is brought pursuant to the provisions of the
Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Ac t of 1975, as amended (the "Act")1
based
on the failure by Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. ("Kaiser"), the largest
health care service plan in California, to provide three (now deceased)
Kaiser enrollees, Margaret Utterback, Wolfgang Spunbarg, and James West
with care and services as mandated by the Act. Also at: http://www.hmohelp.ca.gov/library/enforcements
and $1,000,000.00 Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan (Margaret Utterback) December 3, 2002 Dismissal
of Amended Accusation http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/enforcements/actions/055/6192.pdf and http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/enforcement.html
Kaiser
Fined
for Phlebotomy Practices, Policies; Safety Needles Called Ineffective
http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/bloodletter.html Department
of Health Services Sanction Against Kaiser Permanente Santa
Clara http://kaiserpapers.info/pdfs/kaiserDHSReport.pdf 21 pages
Kaiser
Permanente Final Medical Survey
Report - 1989 - CA Dept. of Corporations Numerous deficiencies were found in all inspected facilities http://businesspractices.kaiserpapers.info/1989.html
Colorado
State Sanctions and Fines
FYI
2001-02 Dept of Health Care Financing - Colorado http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/jbc/hcphrg.pdf Kaiser
Radiation Events 2001 Colorado http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/2001/20010705en.html PNO-IV-01-27, Kaiser Permanente,
TWO MEDICAL MISADMINISTRATIONS INVOLVING IODINE 131. http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/secys/2001/secy2001-0129/2001-0129scy.html
State
of Maryland Sanctions and fines $100,000.00 + http://mdinsurance1.mdinsurance.state.md.us/sa/documents/MIA-2007-01-025-Kaiser.pdf mirrored for historical purposes at: http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/pdfs/MIA-2007-01-025-Kaiser.pdf The Examination, the details of which are contained in the Administration Report Number 857-03 ("the Report"), concluded that Respondent committed violations of the following sections of the Insurance Article, the Health-General Article and the Code of Maryland Regulations (“COMAR”): • Section 2-207(b)(1) of the Insurance Article; • Section 15-112 of the Insurance Article; • Section 15-123(k)(1) of the Insurance Article; • Section 15-822(2)(b) of the Insurance Article; • Section 15-830(f) of the Insurance Article; • Section 15-1005(c) of the Insurance Article; • Section 15-1005(e)(3) of the Insurance Article; • Section 15-1005(f) of the Insurance Article; • Section 15-10A-02(f) of the Insurance Article; • Section 19-712.1 of the Health-General Article; • Section 19-713(a)(2) of the Health-General Article; • COMAR 31.10.16.03B; • COMAR 31.10.16.03C; • COMAR 31.10.16.03F; • COMAR 31.12.02.04A; • COMAR 31.15.08.05.
ORDER WHEREFORE,
pursuant to § 2-204 and § 4-113 of the Insurance Article it
is ORDERED by the Commissioner and AGREED to by Respondent, as follows: 3 A.
Respondent shall correct the violations of Maryland laws and
regulations stated herein within ninety (90) days from the date of
execution of this Order.
B. Respondent shall pay an
administrative penalty to the State of Maryland for the violations
stated herein in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000.00) within thirty (30) days of the date the Commissioner or
his designee signs this Order. Payments shall be made by check or
money order made payable to the Maryland Insurance Administration and
include the case number or name. Payment should be sent to the
attention of, Appeals Clerk, 525 St. Paul Place, Baltimore, MD
21202-2272.
C. Respondent agrees that all amounts paid under
Paragraph B of this Order shall not be included in or recoverable as
expenses in any rate filing filed with the Administration or any other
regulatory authority.
MIA
levies fines against HMO http://baltimore.bcentral.com/baltimore/stories/2000/04/24/daily9.html
Missouri
Fines and Sanctions
$550 State
of Missouri
Dept. of Insurance Fines
Kaiser
Permanente Pulls out of Kansas City several fines and sanctions on this web page. http://news.kaiserpapers.info/kansascity1.html
State
of Oregon Sanctions and Fines Kaiser
was overpaid $10,472 for 20 patients that they had reported as
Institutionalized. This was based on a quick check of 100
patients which were a random sample of 2,391 Medicare beneficiaries
reported as Institutionalized. Medicare determined that
Kaiser
overall was being overpaid $105,624 of patients incorrectly reported as
being Institutionalized. It was determined that part of the
overpayment was related to the poor record keeping of Kaiser
Permanente. It was determined that Kaiser had been overpaid
by at
least $105,624
for patients Institutionalized. http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region5/59700023.pdf
STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF
CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES
INSURANCE DIVISION REPORT OF MARKET CONDUCT EXAMINATION http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/kaiser96mc.html
Texas
Sanctions and
Fines
$1,000,000.00
Below is
information regarding Kaiser and the for profit Permanente's conduct
while working in the State of Texas. Rather than conform to the Texas
State laws and provide decent medical care, Kaiser and the for profit
Permanente left the state.
Official Order of the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Texas, Austin, Texas - April 18, 1997 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Texas, Dallas, Texas Consent Order - Docket No. C-97 97-0389 text and document http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/texasorder.html
articles related to above action and referenced materials at: http://news.kaiserpapers.info/kickedoutnews.html
TDI Announces April 1997 Disciplinary Actions
News article regarding the Texas Department of Insurance Action. Ehlmann v.
Kaiser
Foundation Health Plan of Texas Synopsis:
ERISA: No Duty to Disclose Physician Compensation Arrangements-Ehlmann
v. Kaiser Found Health Plan of Texas1--The United States Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that Health Maintenance
Organizations (HMOs) have no fiduciary obligation to disclose physician
compensation under ERISA absent special circumstances or specific
inquiry. Washington
State Sanctions and Fines
$65,000
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan has been fined $65,000 for denying claims
from 299 policyholders in Southwest Washington who received care in
emergency rooms during 2003 and 2004.
Originally Posted At: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/health/2003160415_kaiser29m.html
Mirrored for historical purposes at: http://www.kaiserpapers.info/65gs.html
CITY
OF LOS
ANGELES FINES
MAY 15, 2007 LA CITY ATTORNEY ROCKY DELGADILLO
ANNOUNCES LANDMARK SETTLEMENT ...http://www.lacity.org/atty/index/attyindex56045233_05152007.pdf
FEB. 14, 2007LA CITY ATTORNEY DELGADILLO DECRIES
HOSPITAL’S STONEWALLING OF ... http://lafind.lacity.org/search?q=cache:Q4pK3QTl_uwJ:www.lacity.org/atty/index/attyindex56043354_ 02142007.pdf+KAISER&access=p&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&client=LACITY&site=ATTY&proxystylesheet= LACITY&oe=UTF-8
NOV. 16, 2006 LA CITY ATTORNEY ROCKY
DELGADILLO FILES LANDMARK CRIMINAL, CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST KAISER
FOR DUMPING HOMELESS PATIENT ON SKID ROW http://www.lacity.org/atty/attypress/attyattypress6941681_11162006.pdf
In November 2006, the City Attorney’s
Office filed criminal charges and commenced a civil
enforcement action against Kaiser Foundation
Hospitals stemming . SPONSORSHIP OF LEGISLATION TO
CRIMINALIZE HOMELESS PATIENT DUMPING
$555,000.00 http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/05/15/america/NA-GEN-US-Homeless-Dumping.php
Kaiser
agrees to reforms in
settlement with Los Angeles aimed at ending homeless 'dumping' Kaiser
will create new protocols for discharging homeless patients in
its chain of hospitals, train staff and allow retired U.S. District
Court Judge Lourdes G. Baird, a former U.S. attorney, to monitor its
progress, officials said Tuesday mirrored for historical
purposes at: http://www.kaiserpapers.info/news/ca/reformbyda.html http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=local&id=5307645&ft=print
Homeless
Dumping Case Settled
Ohio Sanctions and
Fines
May 19, 2000 Kaiser
received Medicare overpayments of $11,214 for 15 beneficiaries.
The 15 beneficiaries were part of a statistical sample of 100
beneficiaries reported as institutionalized between January 1, 1996 and
December 31, 1998. Based on these sample results Medicare
determined that Kaiser was overpaid $49,963.00 for
beneficiaries
incorrectly listed as institutionalized. Kaiser was advised
to
only refund the $11,214.00 although they were advised to investigate
themselves and if their figures agree with Medicare to return all the
money.
http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region5/59900045.pdf
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN
OF KANSAS CITY, INC., Petitioner, vs. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 01-1135 RV http://fines.kaiserpapers.info/kaisermissouri.doc
For the average citizen to better
understand why small fines are given
to Kaiser - further insulting the people that have been
victimized by Kaiser proven criminal actions please read:
Twenty
Things You Should Know About Corporate Crime 21
Corporate Crime Reporter 25, June 12, 2007 from
Corporate Crime Reporter in Washington D.C. http://corporatecrimereporter.com/twenty061207.htm
To The Kaiser Papers
|